Now the Google adsense case is over, here is the Facebook case
There are not only good things about the new Facebook platform.
One of the application "causes" developed by project agape that is meant to involve people in supporting organizations for a better world is hosting 3 causes that will clearly raise hate against Israel. I am shocked to find that they are still hosted in Facebook. The level of activity show they have been there for a while
Facebook should ban those causes asap. Or maybe this is Project Agape responsibility (btw this illustrates the problem of allowing long tail of content and apps making moderation just more complicated). Today those concerns Israel, but tomorrow this could concern more things (i did not scan to see if there is more damage on causes)
Whoever is in charge should do something about that immediately. A cause should be in favor of marking the world a better place, not promoting hate.
I reacted and sent an email to Project Agape. Let's see how fast they react
If you want to join me please report the problem by sending an email at [email protected]
cause number 13052 /1573 / 879
Thanks to Florian for the info
update: well it did not wait. other racist causes are being spotted on Facebook. Orli has the story. below the video
I don't understand why Facebook does not have a control over ads. Those arent ads anymore.. That's propaganda!
Posted by: Syl | 29 August 2007 at 11:55 AM
Same in France with advertising for Le Pen.
Posted by: Jacques Froissant | 29 August 2007 at 12:30 PM
Ouriel, you should do it the Facebook way: create a Cause in facebook to ban all anti-israeli causes in Facebook.
At least, in FB, there are pro-israeli causes (whereas in Google AdSense...)
Posted by: Herve | 29 August 2007 at 12:57 PM
I actually agree with the above. Though I hate to see these guys stupid propaganda, I think we should make the efforts to explain our side, and less try to ban them.
It's kinda a lost battle to ban or silence those protesters, no? And actually in many countries in Europe their cause is legitimate.
People don't like us - that's a fact. We need to find ways to publicize our views, point out the lies and manipulations that other are doing, and let people's intelligence judge for themselves.
We've been very lame in doing this.
Without saying the exact word, in Europe this issue is far beyond a political discussion, and there are many non-logical factors that are involved.
Posted by: Uri L. | 29 August 2007 at 03:04 PM
The banning of information is a slippery slope. If contrary points of view are deemed unsuitable by some "authority" and never published, how would I/we know what others are thinking. Now thats dangerous and short-sighted.
My knowledge of the Israeli Palastine conflict is limited to the N. American press (basically 30sec sound bits). Violence should not be condoned by either side, for any reason. This is what I tell my children if they watch TV newscasts.
Israel should show profound leadership by prohibiting violence against others. Explain its intentions and hold steadfast in a peaceful manner, as a religous country. This would be a more powerful response to the conflict than any military action or building of walls could ever accomplish. IMHO
Posted by: SE | 29 August 2007 at 06:44 PM
Salut Ouriel,
Je t'écris car je susi tombé sur un de tes comments sur le blog de monsieur clavier. Tu disais faire un stage en capital risk à l'époque. Je cherche moi-même désormais un stage en ce domaine.
Pourrais-tu me dire si c'est un bon choix sachant que ce domaine recrute surtout sur le tard? Quel est l'intitulé du poste de stagiaire sachant que peu de stagiaires semblent y évoluer (assistant associate?. J'ai un contact chez 3i et suis intéressé par les NTIC. Merci beaucoup si tu peux m'envoyer un mail à l'adresse ci-dessus. Cordialement.
Posted by: Guillaume | 30 August 2007 at 04:55 PM
Ignorants are everywhere and there is nothing we can do in order to prevent them from get active in social networks.
Posted by: omer rosen | 01 September 2007 at 03:07 PM