ValleyWag loves to take shots at TechCrunch (and many others), but for some curious reasons they missed to mention that the origin of that story on world web clones was actually born on TechCrunch (i wrote it) and instead quotes a unknown blog (story published a week after) that probably read the story on TechCrunch (both France and US) and on this blog too. The pic btw has my mark since i added the red stringline on the French clones.
So let me take a shot at ValleyWag: is this because the story is showcasing some obvious americano-centrism that you preferred not to mention the original TechCrunch US post (that you guys read since you don't miss a coma to shot at this blog)? Or just because it was funnier to shot a french frog blog that probably does not know your blog and won't react? Or maybe lack of digging which is usually typical of Valleywag (a bit too much in my taste)?
What is more disturbing is that Valleywag fails to see the real point. Business2.0 article is full of mistakes not only in France but other countries too. But this would not have made a good post on Valley...
PS: I know taking a shot at valleywag may cost me some shots in return, but this was too tempting
update: a friend of mine informed me that the writer of the post on ValleyWag, Owen Thomas is nothing else than a previous Business2.0 collaborator...this might explain a few things